INT App ID for endpoint: ff20dedf-6bef-4b83-8455-4cd3bfe5f01a
The header values defined in A0042 specification are the same as for the STU3 A006 endpoint
Is this possibly because we need to request access to the A0042 endpoint for our application in INT, that is, A0042 has not been automatically made available for existing applications using A006?
Hi @Gary_England and @zubeir.tai - I’ve request the latest e-RS Product set be added to your INT ASID and this should fix the issue. I’ll confirm back when this is done.
Sorry about that - when we introduce new capability, we do actually request all active INT ASIDs are updated but this one must have been missed.
Hi Gary, I’ve spoken with our ITOC team about this and it’s because you have your own bespoke product set up in INT. They’ve advised me that you need to fill out an MPV request to update your product with the desired eRS API interactions - see link below:
I would suggest you request ‘all the eRS interactions from the latest generic product’ be added to your bespoke product to make sure you have everything you need.
Hi Gary,
Looking at the headers you’ve provided, it doesn’t look like the request is using an OAuth2 access token in the expected format. For A042 the Authorization header needs to be sent as:
Authorization: Bearer <access_token>
At the moment it looks like you’re sending a raw token value without the Bearer prefix, which would result in a 401. Could you please confirm you are generating a valid access token via the signed JWT flow and then passing it in the format above when calling A042.
We have added the “Bearer “ prefix to Authorization header content for both STU3 and R4 request generation classes, and the full set of interactions we require now work as expected
A few observations on this:
The STU3 endpoint appear to work both with and without the “Bearer “ prefix
The R4 endpoint works in OpenTest. While I recognise that OpenTest does not check the CIS2 token, it should probably check the header syntax
We did share the full header content in the original description of the error